I watched the Colbert Report the other night when Wayne
Coyne of the Flaming Lips was Colbert’s guest. They discussed whether Coyne had
gone into the music business in order to get laid more than he would have
otherwise.
This is of course a truism among musicians – at least the
male ones. In my own case, I am not certain that during my performing years I was thinking so much about sex in such bare
terms – I hoped men would be more attracted to me if I was a Girl With Guitar,
because I didn’t feel attractive otherwise. And in fact, it works in a way, but not a very agreeable one in my
experience.
So what is it about musicians that makes them so
attractive? Because it’s really not about good looks. I don’t have a definitive answer, but I think there is a synergy between authenticity and mojo. Spilling your guts in public is
not something many people can pull off – let’s face it, most people are more terrified
of performing than they are of spiders (exactly the opposite of me). Yet that’s
what we want our musicians to do. And the good ones put out. They do it on the audience’s behalf,
expressing what for most people is inexpressible. We project enormous amounts
of emotion onto musicians, particularly the front people like lead guitar
players and singers - when they spill their guts in a way we can relate to,
it’s a blow against all the slings and arrows of living a conventional (which
is almost by definition inauthentic) life.
The core of this process is mojo: magic. And of course,
to be Freudian about it, mojo is deeply erotic. Now if you’re the musician,
even if you are hoping your musicianness will make you more attractive and
increase your odds of getting laid, you can still be terrified of being the
receptacle for all that projected feeling.
It doesn’t help your career to be intolerant of such
projection. Some people are highly tolerant. Like Madonna, for example. She
soaks it up like a sponge. Of course, she’s not so much spilling her personal
guts, but serving as an avatar (in the old sense of being the embodiment of the
divine, not a persona in a game or a favicon).
I think the most
successful performers, at least the ones who don’t burn out and die young, are
those who have it in them to be an avatar but maintain good boundaries so that
they don’t fall into complete dissolution. You have to have a strong ego to
remain standing as other people’s waves of yearning and passion break against
you. And you have to tap your own yearning and passion to do your job. The
difficulty of balancing the need for normalcy with the thrill of activated mojo
is, I suspect, one of the reasons musicians behave so weirdly. Because the gut-spilling and mojo are authentic while they’re
going on, but they don’t transfer to life outside performance. You can be the
most sensitive person in the world when you’re writing and performing a song
about love, but that doesn’t make you good at either intimacy or sex. It’s
really hard to understand this – I’ve seen it from both sides now (sorry, Joni)
and I still turn into a groupie for a guy with a guitar.
Yet this knife-edge that artists inhabit is essential; art
requires authenticity and divinity both. Most artists will wither away if they
can’t express themselves and communicate their expression to others, and I
believe that artists can have profoundly beneficial effects on individuals and
society (with the exception of Ted Nugent). They can inspire social change, and
they can help individuals making terrible journeys through the abyss, whether mental
or physical. I truly believe the music of the Beatles, Joni Mitchell, and many
others have actually preserved my life many times over.
This brings me to the song “Killing Me Softly,” written
by Norman Gimbel and Charles Fox (although according to Wikipedia, Lori Lieberman, the first
person to record the song, says she had a hand in its composition also). It
became a big hit when Roberta
Flack recorded it in 1972. I learned it during a phase when I was playing
solo in an airport lounge and a Hilton hotel. I thought it was too
middle-of-the-road for me really, but I liked the melody a lot, and I thought
if I performed it, the patrons of lounges in airports and hotels would probably
be inclined to tip.
“Killing Me Softly” is astonishingly robust. There are
more than 1000 mp3s of it at Amazon.com,
including lots of karaoke, pan pipes and romantic guitar and string versions. I’ve just listened to snippets of renditions by
Perry Como, Anne Murray, the Fugees, Dame Edna, the Band of the Queen’s
Regiment, Nat Cross (on the bluntly-titled Music for Sex album), the Bulgarian
pop star Yordanka
Hristova, and many others. The song can be done in numerous styles,
although it nestles into Latin grooves especially easily as evidenced by the Rhythms del Mundo Cuba version, and no matter how
badly it’s interpreted, its beautiful melody, riding over a lush chord
progression like a little inflatable boat over gentle rapids, comes through
unscathed.
But the lyrics wash you up on the painful shore of irony.
Pay special attention to the third verse:
I heard he sang a good song
I heard he had a style
And so I came to see him
To listen for a while
And there he was this young boy
A stranger to my eyes
Chorus:
Strumming my pain with his fingers
Singing my life with his words
Killing me softly with his song
Killing me softly with his song
Telling my whole life with his words
Killing me softly with his song
I felt all flushed with fever
Embarrassed by the crowd
I felt he found my letters and
Read each one out loud
I prayed that he would finish
But he just kept right on
Chorus
He sang as if he
knew me
In all my dark
despair
And then he looked
right through me
As if I wasn‘t
there
And he just kept on singing
Singing clear and strong
Chorus
So groupies beware! (Note to self: Beware!!) What happens on stage should stay there. The best place
to keep all those yearnings and urges engendered by the mojo of gut-spilling
musicians is in your head – in the Platonic realm of ideal forms. Not on your
futon.
No comments:
Post a Comment
argue all you want but be polite